The proliferation of advanced natural language processing applications has demonstrated the critical importance of ensuring the accuracy and reliability of generated text, particularly in domains where erroneous information can have significant consequences. The novel integration of a majority voting mechanism within a Mixture of Experts (MoE) framework, specifically in the Mistral 8x7b model, offers a significant advancement by leveraging the collective expertise of multiple specialized experts to mitigate hallucinations and enhance output precision. Through a rigorous experimental setup, the research demonstrated that the application of majority voting substantially reduced the incidence of hallucinations while improving the overall accuracy of the model’s outputs. Detailed analysis revealed that the consensus-based approach effectively filtered out erroneous responses, providing a more reliable and trustworthy output. The methodology encompassed comprehensive mechanisms for input processing, expert output collection, and dynamic expert selection, further refining the model’s contextual adaptability and robustness. Results indicated a notable improvement in accuracy and a manageable increase in computational overhead, validating the practical viability of the approach. This study’s findings significantly contribute to the ongoing efforts to enhance the reliability of large language models, presenting a robust framework with broad applications in various critical fields.