loading page

Use of deprescribing search filters in systematic review search strategies: a case study
  • +3
  • Thomas Morel,
  • Clara Heinrich,
  • Lorène Zerah,
  • Eoin Hurley,
  • Antoine Christiaens,
  • Jean-Pascal Fournier
Thomas Morel
Nantes University
Author Profile
Clara Heinrich
University College Cork
Author Profile
Lorène Zerah
Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris
Author Profile
Eoin Hurley
University College Cork
Author Profile
Antoine Christiaens
Sorbonne Universite
Author Profile
Jean-Pascal Fournier
Nantes University

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile

Abstract

Deprescribing search filters aiming at maximizing sensitivity for MEDLINE and for Embase were recently developed. Simultaneously, The US Deprescribing Network (USden) developed a deprescribing search strategy that included a deprescribing search filter for MEDLINE. The aim of this case study was to implement these deprescribing search filters in original search strategies from deprescribing related systematic reviews (SRs) and to calculate their performances. Two deprescribing SRs were included. Authors were asked to repeat the selection process described in SRs original methods. Performances of search strategies implemented with deprescribing search filters (ISS) were calculated and compared to original search strategies (OSS). In MEDLINE, sensitivity for SR 1 was 50% for OSS (Precision: 2.8%), 58% for ISS with maximised sensitivity filter (Precision: 1.7%) and 42% for ISS with USden filter (Precision: 5.1%). Sensitivity for SR 2 was 25% for all search strategies (Precision: 0.1%, 0.2% and 1,2% respectively). In Embase, sensitivity for SR 1 was 33% (Precision: 4,1%) for OSS and 58% for ISS (Precision 2.1%). No articles were included through Embase search strategies for SR 2. Using maximized sensitivity deprescribing filters may increase the exhaustivity of deprescribing SRs. Precision offered by the USDeN deprescribing filter is a convenient alternative for non-systematic reviews.
01 Feb 2023Submitted to Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology
02 Feb 2023Submission Checks Completed
02 Feb 2023Assigned to Editor
02 Feb 2023Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
02 Feb 2023Reviewer(s) Assigned
22 Mar 2023Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
21 Apr 20231st Revision Received
21 Apr 2023Submission Checks Completed
21 Apr 2023Assigned to Editor
21 Apr 2023Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
24 Apr 2023Reviewer(s) Assigned
12 May 2023Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
23 May 20232nd Revision Received
24 May 2023Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
24 May 2023Submission Checks Completed
24 May 2023Assigned to Editor
24 May 2023Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
29 May 20233rd Revision Received
30 May 2023Submission Checks Completed
30 May 2023Assigned to Editor
30 May 2023Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
30 May 2023Editorial Decision: Accept