loading page

Non-vitamin K Oral Anticoagulants in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation
  • +12
  • Antonio Creta,
  • Ross Hunter,
  • Mark Earley,
  • Malcolm Finlay,
  • Mehul Dhinoja,
  • Simon Sporton,
  • Anthony Chow,
  • Saidi Mohiddin,
  • Serge Boveda,
  • Pedro Adragão,
  • Zeynab Jebberi,
  • Daniel Matos,
  • Richard Schilling,
  • Pier Lambiase,
  • Rui Providência
Antonio Creta
Barts and The London NHS Trust

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Ross Hunter
St Bartholomew's Hospital
Author Profile
Mark Earley
Barts Health NHS Trust
Author Profile
Malcolm Finlay
Barts Health NHS Trust
Author Profile
Mehul Dhinoja
Barts and The London NHS Trust
Author Profile
Simon Sporton
Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital
Author Profile
Anthony Chow
Barts and The London NHS Trust
Author Profile
Saidi Mohiddin
Barts and The London NHS Trust
Author Profile
Serge Boveda
Clinique Pasteur
Author Profile
Pedro Adragão
EP Centre Cardiology, Hospital de Santa Cruz, Hospital de Santa Cruz
Author Profile
Zeynab Jebberi
Clinique Pasteur
Author Profile
Daniel Matos
Hospital de Santa Cruz
Author Profile
Richard Schilling
Barts and The London NHS Trust
Author Profile
Pier Lambiase
Barts Heart Centre, Barts Health NHS trust
Author Profile
Rui Providência
Barts Health NHS Trust
Author Profile

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and atrial fibrillation (AF) require chronic anticoagulation due to a high thromboembolic risk. Evidence supporting use of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with HCM remains sparse, and there are no data regarding the use of NOACs in HCM patients undergoing catheter ablation of AF. Methods: Observational non-randomised study in 4 European Centres. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of NOACs compared with vitamin-K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with HCM undergoing catheter ablation for AF. Results: One hundred thirty-seven HCM patients (mean age 55.0±13.4, 29.1% female) underwent 230 catheter ablations for AF (1.7±1.0 per patient). A total of 55 patients (39.4%) underwent 70 procedures (30.4%) on NOAC, while the remaining were on VKA. Warfarin (97.6%) and rivaroxaban (56.4%) were the most frequently used agents in the respective groups. No procedure-related deaths were reported. We observed no significant difference in the rate of thromboembolism (VKA 0.6%; NOAC 0%; p=1.0) or minor bleeding (VKA 0.6%; NOAC 1.4%; p=0.54). There was a non-significant trend towards a lower incidence of major bleeding (VKA 6.8%; NOAC 1.4%; p=0.09). Conclusion: These preliminary data suggest that NOACs are at least as safe and effective as VKAs in patients with HCM undergoing catheter ablation for AF.
15 May 2020Submitted to Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
18 May 2020Assigned to Editor
18 May 2020Submission Checks Completed
19 May 2020Reviewer(s) Assigned
01 Jun 2020Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
06 Jun 2020Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
14 Jun 20201st Revision Received
15 Jun 2020Submission Checks Completed
15 Jun 2020Assigned to Editor
15 Jun 2020Reviewer(s) Assigned
29 Jun 2020Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
30 Jun 2020Editorial Decision: Accept
Oct 2020Published in Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology volume 31 issue 10 on pages 2626-2631. 10.1111/jce.14659